U of A University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture

Pictures of chickens, flowers, wheat, a boy looking through a magnifying glass, irrigation pipe, soybean pods, and fruits and vegetables.

Cooperative Extension Service

Cooperative Extension Service

Agricultural Experiment Station


Search | Publications | Jobs | Personnel Directory | Links
County Offices | Departments

About Us

Find Us

For the Media

Agriculture

Aquaculture
       & Fisheries

Beef
Corn
Cotton
Dairy
Forage/Pasture
Forestry
Grain Sorghum
Horses
Horticulture
      Commercial

Poultry
Rice
Soybean
Specialty Agriculture
Swine
Wheat

Links
Newsletters

Business & Communities

Families & Consumers

Health & Nutrition

Home & Garden

Natural Resources

4-H Youth Development

Public Policy Center

For Faculty & Staff

Giving

Dale Bumpers College
of Agricultural, Food &
Life Sciences


Division Home


Agricultural Experiment
      Station Home


Cooperative Extension
      Service Home

 

Livestock and Forages News Articles
Articles published in Arkansas Cattle Business
Animal Science: Today and Tomorrow - June 2007

Annual Feedlot Update

According to the Kansas State University, 2006 feeding performance for steers and heifers improved rather modestly over 2005. Average closeouts weights were much higher in 2006, due to longer days on feed and better average daily gains. In 2006, the cost of gain for both steers and heifers was well above the prior year, in response to drastically higher corn and hay costs.

In 2006, the average closeout weight for steers was 1,312 lbs., 25 lbs. heavier than 2005's and 50 lbs. above the 2001 – 2005 average. Heifers closed out at an average 1,192 lbs., well above the 1,164 lbs. reported for 2005 and 4 percent higher than the prior five-year average. Steers were placed at an average weight of 776 lbs., 17 lbs. less than 2005's while heifer placement weights were up about 2 percent. 

Steers were on feed an average 158 days in 2006 which was 7 days longer than in 2005, while heifers were on feed an average 2 days more at 152 days. Feedlots reported an average daily gain for steers at 3.40 lbs. per day vs. 3.33 lbs. and 3.05 lbs. per day for heifers which was about 2 percent higher than 2005's. Steers required an average 5.95 lbs. of feed, down from the 6.10-pound average for 2005, while heifers needed an average 6.19 lbs. vs. 6.28 lbs. the year prior.

Feedlots reported the cost of gain for steers in 2006 at $53.94 per cwt., only $0.83 per cwt. higher than in 2005 but $3.52 per cwt. higher than the 2001 – 2005 average. Heifers closed out at an average $57.10 per cwt., $1.40 per cwt. higher than 2005's average.

For 2006, feedlots reported an average corn price of $2.77 per bushel, only $0.33 per bushel higher than 2005's average as prices did not surpass the $3 per bushel mark until late in the year. Alfalfa hay at an average $109.39 per ton in 2006 was the highest annual price reported thus far in the survey (began in 1992). Compared to 2005, hay prices in 2006 were more than $33 per ton higher and were nearing $140 per ton in December.

Interaction That Affected the Selling Price of Feeder Cattle

This is the last article discussing the results of an auction barn survey conducted from January 1 to December 31, 2005, to determine the factors that affect feeder cattle prices. It addresses some interactions that affected the selling price of calves and a project summary. The last article will compare the discounts and premiums from the 2000 and 2005 study.

Factors affecting the selling price of lightweight calves (≤ 500 lbs.) were different than the factors that affected the selling price of heavier cattle (> 550 lbs.). For example, breed and color were very important factors in determining the price of lightweight cattle, but as cattle weights increased, breed and color became less important. Therefore, if a producer sells a breed or breed type that are discounted as lightweight cattle, they may be better off keeping those cattle until they weigh over 550 lbs.

For lightweight cattle, grey white-faced, red, red white-faced, white, and spotted or striped cattle were discounted. As calf weight increased, only spotted or striped cattle were discounted. Therefore, if cattle producers were selling grey white-faced, red, red- white faced, or white calves, they may be better off selling them at heavier weights (> 650 lbs.).

For all but one weight category (400 to 449 lbs.), the selling price between large- and medium-framed calves across weight groups was the same. Regardless of selling weigh, small-framed cattle were heavily discounted.

Muscle was a major factor that affected selling price regardless of calf weight. The selling price of muscle scores 1 vs. 2 calves weighing 300 to 349 lbs. was $16.00 per cwt. As calf weights increased, the discounts seemed to flatten but remained rather large. In addition, muscle score 2 cattle were discounted from a low of $7.00 in June to a high of $10.00 in January, February, March and April. The discount between 1’s and 2’s was $8.00 to $9.00 in the fall. This indicates that muscle thickness is a very important factor in determining the selling price of all calves.

It’s thought that a smaller discount exists between lightweight bulls and steers as compared to heavyweight bulls and steers. The 2005 data doesn’t support that thought. The selling price difference between bulls and steers remained rather constant as calf weight increased. The selling price between 300 to 349 lbs. bulls and steers calves was $8.00 per cwt., and the selling price between 700 to 749 lbs. bulls and steers calves was $8.00 per cwt. The selling price between bulls and steers ranged $5.00 to $8.00 cwt. across all weight groups. Even though the price per cwt. remained rather constant, the discount per head increases as calf weight increased.

The discounts for bulls did decrease during the spring compared to the fall. Bulls sold for $4.00 to 5.00 cwt. less than steers in February and March. During the fall (September, October and November), the bull discounts increased to $6.00 to $8.00 per cwt.

If you have any questions about managing herd genetics to improve the value of your calves, contact your local county Extension agent.

By: Dr. Keith Lusby and Dr. Tom Troxel

Back to Articles published in Arkansas Cattle Business


© 2006
University of Arkansas
Division of Agriculture
All rights reserved.
Last Date Modified 07/15/2008
Webmaster

University of Arkansas • Division of Agriculture
Cooperative Extension Service
2301 South University Avenue
Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 • USA
Phone (501) 671-2000 • Fax (501) 671-2209
 

MissionDisclaimerEEO
PrivacyFOI