U of A University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture

Pictures of chickens, flowers, wheat, a boy looking through a magnifying glass, irrigation pipe, soybean pods, and fruits and vegetables.

Cooperative Extension Service

Cooperative Extension Service

Agricultural Experiment Station


Search | Publications | Jobs | Personnel Directory | Links
County Offices | Departments

About Us

Find Us

For the Media

Agriculture

Aquaculture
       & Fisheries

Beef
Corn
Cotton
Dairy
Forage/Pasture
Forestry
Grain Sorghum
Horses
Horticulture
      Commercial

Poultry
Rice
Soybean
Specialty Agriculture
Swine
Wheat

Links
Newsletters

Business & Communities

Families & Consumers

Health & Nutrition

Home & Garden

Natural Resources

4-H Youth Development

Public Policy Center

For Faculty & Staff

Giving

Dale Bumpers College
of Agricultural, Food &
Life Sciences


Division Home


Agricultural Experiment
      Station Home


Cooperative Extension
      Service Home

 

Livestock and Forages News Articles
Articles published in Arkansas Cattle Business
Animal Science: Today and Tomorrow - August 2006

Two months ago, we introduced a study to determine the current strengths and limitations and future opportunities and threats of the Arkansas beef industry. The study was supported by the Arkansas Beef Council and was conducted by the Division of Agriculture of the University of Arkansas and the Arkansas Beef Council. Five groups of 100 producers each were randomly picked from approximately 2,000 representing cow-calf (small and large herds), purebred, stocker/feeder and support industries in 66 counties and were surveyed.

Two months ago, we discussed responses from small cow-calf herds. This month, we will discuss the findings of the Arkansas Beef Audit and highlight producer perceptions about current strengths, weaknesses, future opportunities and threats of the large cow-calf segment (> 50 cows).

Demographics

Over 74% of the large herd respondents were over 51 years of age, and 83% had over 20 years experience in the cattle business. Only 5.7% of the respondents were less than 40 years of age.

Current Strengths and Limitations

Large cow-calf survey respondents listed marketing as a major strength. The ability to take advantage of more market options due to having more calves to market was a strong advantage. Other strengths included climate and land resources favorable to cattle production. Large-scale production also allowed increased ability to spread input costs over a larger number of animals which reduced investments and inputs per cow. The availability of by-products for the use in animal feeds or as fertilizer was also listed as a strength of producing cattle in the state.

Large cow-calf operators were extremely concerned about rising input costs. Recent events in the beef cattle industry have added a great deal of volatility to the cattle market. Survey participants felt that unpredictable market prices and our current lack of export markets were important limitations. Additionally, increasing environmental regulations, including regulations on phosphorus levels, and the increasing number of animal rights and environmental activist groups were found to be limitations. As cities grow and urban sprawl increases, land available for expansion becomes both limited and expensive.

Future Opportunities and Threats

Use of production technology to increase production efficiency was an extremely important future opportunity for large cow-calf producers. Maximizing forage growth and utilization and taking advantage of improved cattle genetics to meet consumer demands were listed as important opportunities. The ability to take advantage of scientific knowledge will become increasingly important in cattle production. Other future opportunities identified were related to marketing, which included taking advantage of contracts and other marketing options.

Increased input costs were identified as the number one threat. Producers were worried that increased costs of production due to fuel, fertilizer, and other inputs threatened their ability to turn a profit. Additionally, large cow-calf producers rated animal health and disease issues as another large threat to the industry. The loss of consumer confidence in beef, whether related to disease or other issues, was also recognized as an important future threat. Since the beef industry is a consumer-driven industry, loss of consumer support would directly impact producers’ ability to be profitable. Another major threat to large cow-calf operators was the recent effort to change the method of determining land value for assessing property taxes (Table 1).

Educational Opportunities

Educational priorities for the large cow-calf industry centered on marketing issues, input costs, public confidence in the beef cattle industry, and environmental issues. Members of this industry were very concerned with their future profitability and how they could manage costs.

Table 1. Responses by Large Cow-Calf Operators. (All responses are listed in order of most important to least important)

Current strengths

  1. Marketability of product
  2. Climate and land favorable to forage
  3. Lower investment per cow
  4. Ability to diversify marketing
  5. Ability to select specific genetics
  6. Availability of by-products for feed & fertilizer
  7. Availability of educational opportunities
  8. Better economics of scale
  9. Infrastructure of the industry

Current limitations 

  1. Fuel costs
  2. Rising input costs
  3. Unpredictable market prices
  4. Export limitations
  5. Limited land for expansion
  6. Beef cattle and land management complexities
  7. Environmental regulations
  8. Increased urban pressure and encroachment
  9. Phosphorus issues
  10. Animal rights and environmental activists

Future opportunities

  1. Maximize forage utilization
  2. Increased marketing option opportunities
  3. Improvement of genetics to meet consumer demand
  4. Take advantage of scientific knowledge
  5. Advertising to promote products
  6. Take advantage of government programs
  7. Cooperative programs to pool resources
  8. Pooling larger herds to market
  9. Increase size of operations

Future threats

  1. Rising input costs
  2. Animal health issues (disease outbreaks, antibiotic resistance, etc.)
  3. Downturn in calf prices
  4. BSE and other animal diseases
  5. Loss of agricultural value vs. commercial value in determining property taxes
  6. Environmental issues
  7. Loss of consumer confidence in beef

For additional information, contact your local county Extension agent.

By: Dr. Keith Lusby and Dr. Tom Troxel

Back to Articles published in Arkansas Cattle Business


© 2006
University of Arkansas
Division of Agriculture
All rights reserved.
Last Date Modified 07/15/2008
Webmaster

University of Arkansas • Division of Agriculture
Cooperative Extension Service
2301 South University Avenue
Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 • USA
Phone (501) 671-2000 • Fax (501) 671-2209
 

MissionDisclaimerEEO
PrivacyFOI