Temperature Effects (Environmental Based Findings)

Pictures of chickens, flowers, wheat, a boy looking through a magnifying glass, irrigation pipe, soybean pods, and fruits and vegetables.	Cooperative Extension Service





Cooperative Extension Service	Agricultural Experiment Station
Search \| Publications \| Jobs \| Personnel Directory \| Links County Offices \| Departments

Aquaculture
& Fisheries
Beef
Beekeeping
Corn
Cotton
Dairy
Forage/Pasture
Forestry
Grain Sorghum
Horses
Horticulture
Commercial
Poultry
Rice
Soybean
Specialty Agriculture
Swine
Wheat

Links
Newsletters

Business & Communities

4-H Youth Development

Public Policy Center

For Faculty & Staff

Giving

Dale Bumpers College
of Agricultural, Food &
Life Sciences

Division Home

Agricultural Experiment
Station Home

Cooperative Extension
Service Home

Animal Manure and Mortality Management
Arkansas Swine Odor Survey - Environment Based Findings
Temperature Effects

For an explanation of the presentation format of this information refer to the data analysis appendices and data analysis sections in the report.

Significant Difference Matrix Class: Temperature Odor Source: Facility, Application, and Mortality
	50	55	60	65	70	75	80	85	90	95
50
55	M V
60		M V
65	M		M
70	M	M V
75	M V		M V		V
80	M	M V				M V
85		M V		M	M	M V	M
90	M V	M	V		V		V	M V
95

Odor Rank Distribution Summary Class: Temperature Odor Source: Facility, Application, and Mortality
								Rank Occurrence Frequency
Type	Num	Min	Max	Mean	Med	Mod	Std	1	2	3	4
50	68	1	4	1.83	2	1	0.87	42.65%	35.29%	16.18%	5.88%
55	52	1	3	1.28	1	1	0.58	78.85%	13.46%	7.69%	0.00%
60	52	1	3.5	1.76	1.5	1	0.81	44.23%	30.77%	23.08%	1.92%
65	36	1	3	1.42	1	1	0.72	69.44%	16.67%	13.89%	0.00%
70	89	1	4	1.56	1	1	0.80	56.18%	31.46%	7.87%	4.49%
75	228	1	4	1.40	1	1	0.64	67.54%	25.44%	5.70%	1.32%
80	375	1	4	1.58	1	1	0.77	57.07%	26.40%	14.93%	1.60%
85	168	1	4	1.78	2	1	0.79	43.45%	34.52%	20.24%	1.79%
90	51	1	3	1.55	2	1	0.58	49.02%	47.06%	3.92%	0.00%
95	0

Chart showing all odor equals temperature.

All Odor = Function (Temperature)
Regression Statistics
R Square	0.00066
Standard Error	0.75679
Observations	1119

ANOVA
	d f	S S	M S	F	Signifi-cance F
Regression	1	0.4200	0.4200	0.73339259	0.3920
Residual	1117	639.7475	0.5727
Total	1118	640.1676

	Coefficients	Standard Error	t Stat	P-value
Intercept	1.4329	0.1660	8.6338	2.0164E-17
T	0.0019	0.0022	0.8564	0.391969399

	Lower 95%	Upper 95%	Lower 99.0%	Upper 99.0%
Intercept	1.1073	1.7586	1.0047	1.8612
T	-0.0025	0.0063	-0.0039	0.0077

Significant Difference Matrix Class: Temperature Odor Source: Facility
	50	55	60	65	70	75	80	85	90	95
50
55	M V
60		M V
65	M		M
70	M V		M V
75	M V	V	M V	V	M V
80	M V	M	M			M V
85		M V		M	M V	M V	M V
90	M V	M	V			M V		V
95

Odor Rank Distribution Summary Class: Temperature Odor Source: Facility
								Rank Occurrence Frequency
Type	Num	Min	Max	Mean	Med	Mod	Std	1	2	3	4
50	68	1	4	1.83	2	1	0.87	42.65%	35.29%	16.18%	5.88%
55	52	1	3	1.28	1	1	0.58	78.85%	13.46%	7.69%	0.00%
60	52	1	3.5	1.76	1.5	1	0.81	44.23%	30.77%	23.08%	1.92%
65	36	1	3	1.42	1	1	0.72	69.44%	16.67%	13.89%	0.00%
70	85	1	3	1.45	1	1	0.62	58.82%	32.94%	8.24%	0.00%
75	197	1	3.5	1.25	1	1	0.47	75.63%	22.84%	1.02%	0.51%
80	339	1	4	1.47	1	1	0.70	62.54%	25.07%	11.50%	0.88%
85	157	1	4	1.75	2	1	0.79	45.86%	32.48%	19.75%	1.91%
90	39	1	3	1.54	1	1	0.60	51.28%	43.59%	5.13%	0.00%
95	0

Chart showing facility odor equals temperature.

Facility Odor = Function (Temperature)
Regression Statistics
R Square	0.00008
Standard Error	0.70396
Observations	1025

ANOVA
	d f	S S	M S	F	Signifi-cance F
Regression	1	0.0416	0.0416	0.08394032	0.7721
Residual	1023	506.9584	0.4956
Total	1024	507.0000

	Coefficients	Standard Error	t Stat	P-value
Intercept	1.5451	0.1572	9.8263	7.747E-22
T	-0.0006	0.0021	-0.2897	0.77208568

	Lower 95%	Upper 95%	Lower 99.0%	Upper 99.0%
Intercept	1.2366	1.8537	1.1393	1.9509
T	-0.0048	0.0036	-0.0062	0.0049

Significant Difference Matrix Class: Temperature Odor Source: Application
	50	55	60	65	70	75	80	85	90	95
50
55
60
65
70
75					M
80					M
85					M
90					M	M V	M
95

Odor Rank Distribution Summary Class: Temperature Odor Source: Application
								Rank Occurrence Frequency
Type	Num	Min	Max	Mean	Med	Mod	Std	1	2	3	4
50	0
55	0
60	0
65	0
70	4	4	4	4.00	4	4	0.00	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	100.00%
75	26	1	4	2.35	2	2	0.85	15.38%	42.31%	34.62%	7.69%
80	36	1	4	2.57	3	3	0.75	5.56%	38.89%	47.22%	8.33%
85	5	1	3	2.00	2	2	0.71	20.00%	60.00%	20.00%	0.00%
90	12	1	2	1.58	2	2	0.51	41.67%	58.33%	0.00%	0.00%
95	0

Chart showing application odor equals temperature.

Application Odor = Function (Temperature)
Regression Statistics
R Square	0.13578
Standard Error	0.81676
Observations	83

ANOVA
	d f	S S	M S	F	Signifi-cance F
Regression	1	8.4892	8.4892	12.7256299	0.0006
Residual	81	54.0349	0.6671
Total	82	62.5241

	Coefficients	Standard Error	t Stat	P-value
Intercept	6.9825	1.2901	5.4125	6.1785E-07
T	-0.0586	0.0164	-3.5673	0.00060913

	Lower 95%	Upper 95%	Lower 99.0%	Upper 99.0%
Intercept	4.4157	9.5493	3.5794	10.3856
T	-0.0913	-0.0259	-0.1020	-0.0153

Back to Arkansas Swine Odor Survey

University of Arkansas • Division of Agriculture
Cooperative Extension Service
2301 South University Avenue
Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 • USA
Phone (501) 671-2000 • Fax (501) 671-2209

Mission • Disclaimer • EEO •
Privacy • FOI

Animal Manure and Mortality Management Arkansas Swine Odor Survey - Environment Based Findings Temperature Effects

Animal Manure and Mortality Management
Arkansas Swine Odor Survey - Environment Based Findings
Temperature Effects