U of A University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Research and Extension University of Arkansas System

Pictures of chickens, flowers, wheat, a boy looking through a magnifying glass, irrigation pipe, soybean pods, and fruits and vegetables.

Cooperative Extension Service

Cooperative Extension Service

Agricultural Experiment Station


Search | Publications | Jobs | Personnel Directory | Links
County Offices | Departments

About Us

Find Us

For the Media

Agriculture

Aquaculture
       & Fisheries

Beef
Beekeeping
Corn
Cotton
Dairy
Forage/Pasture
Forestry
Grain Sorghum
Horses
Horticulture
      Commercial

Poultry
Rice
Soybean
Specialty Agriculture
Swine
Wheat

Links
Newsletters

Business & Communities

Families & Consumers

Health & Nutrition

Home & Garden

Natural Resources

4-H Youth Development

Public Policy Center

For Faculty & Staff

Giving

Dale Bumpers College
of Agricultural, Food &
Life Sciences


Division Home


Agricultural Experiment
      Station Home


Cooperative Extension
      Service Home

 

Insect Management
Red Imported Fire Ants
Community Abatement - Miller County (Texarkana)

A Community Abatement Program
Douglas B. Petty - County Extension Agent
Miller County Arkansas

IntroductionMethods OrganizationTreatmentsResults and Discussion • Problems and Solutions

Introduction: During the summer of 1993, a fire ant abatement program was initiated to reduce the population of red imported fire ants in an urban area by treatment of entire city blocks. The program was a cooperative effort involving the City of Texarkana Arkansas and the Miller County Cooperative Extension Service. Due to the positive response from the participants, the program was enlarged and repeated in 1994 ,1995, 1996, 1997 & 1998.

Methods: A survey of local doctors and emergency rooms revealed that the imported fire ant was a public health nuisance to people living in Texarkana. The fire ant abatement program was an attempt to address this problem.

Organization: Each city block involved selected a coordinator to work directly with the City and the Extension Service in organization of treatments, payments, problem solving and dissemination of information to residents. A block coordinator does not need to have any expertise in insect control. The main qualification for a block coordinator is to have an interest in their neighborhood, and be available. Coordinators also received special training on fire ant control practices. Blocks participating must have at least 80%, but preferably 100% resident participation. Fees of $1.75 per 1,000 square feet, are assessed from each homeowner to cover the cost of insecticides, equipment and labor (previously $1.50). If residents were unsure as to lot size, a grid overlaid on city maps was used to determine square footage. Persons wishing to pay for treatment of another's lot, could do so after obtaining written permission. Property eligible for treatment included residential and non-profit organizations such as churches found within neighborhoods.

Treatments: The initial implementation of the program could not support the cost of labor, therefore employees of the Public Works Department of Texarkana applied the chemical treatments. Cooperative Extension agents provided the technical assistance. The baits were bought in bulk from a local distributor. Treatments began after April 15, with a broadcast treatment of a bait insecticide, Amdro, applied by a Herd spreader mounted on a rented lawn tractor with mowing deck removed. As recommended by the Miller County Extension Service, a broadcast treatment or individual mound treatment was applied in mid-May. Residents were then given small flags to mark any additional reappearing mounds. City workers used Amdro bait insecticide unless the weather conditions were unfavorable at which time Orthene (a contact insecticide) was used to treat marked mounds. Treatments were made on a three week cycle through the end of August. A follow-up application of a growth-regulator bait, Logic, was broadcast at the end of the treatment period to reduce the possibility of reinfestation.

Results and Discussion: In 1993, twenty-nine city blocks were enrolled in the program totaling 90 treated acres. The average lot was 16,346 square feet with a cost of $24.52. Payments totaling $5,860 were received. This was sufficient to cover expense of the chemicals, $2,643, with the remaining $3,217 used to purchase the lawn tractor. Treatments consisted of: 1 1/2 lbs/A of Amdro on April 22, 3 Tbsp/mound of Amdro on May 5, 2 tsp/ mound of Orthene on May 17, June 1, June 28 and October 4, and 1 1/2 lbs/A of Logic on September 17. Three neighborhoods contained 50' by 50' test plots to evaluate the success of the program, Castleridge, Sanderson Lane and East Street. The treated plots showed a 96 to 100% reduction in active fire ant mounds. A survey was mailed in the spring of 1994 to all who participated in 1993. Eighty-four of the 239 surveys mailed were returned. Six percent of the survey respondents felt that they did not receive their money's worth, but 100% were interested in participating in 1994.

In 1994, forty-nine city blocks were enrolled totaling 201 treated acres. Payments received equaled $13,145, with the cost of chemicals totaling $5,382. Treatments consisted of 1 1/2 lbs/A of Amdro in late April, three individual mound treatments of Amdro or Orthene from May through August and a final broadcast application of 1 1/2 lbs/A of Amdro or Logic in September. Individual mound treatment schedules did not follow the three week cycle of the previous year due to other demands on the city workers or weather conditions. In 1993 and 1994, the cost of labor was negligible since the city workers were already paid by the city. The program involved 896 man hours, half of which was provided by Community Service workers.

Profits from the program made it possible to hire a city employee ($6.10/hr) for the summer to make treatment applications and perform other duties relative to maintaining the program. This should provide a level of consistency in the application of the program. City and Community Service workers will continue to provide some of the labor but at a much lower level.

Some residents that have participated since the beginning have expressed reluctance to continue to fund treatment of their lot since they have no or very minimal problems with the fire ant at this time. This problem was overlooked in the beginning, but will be addressed in the future through education of new participants. It is important for the residents to understand that one or two years of fire ant control is not permanent and financial support is necessary to maintain fire ant suppression by either reduced treatment rates on their own property or treatment of buffer zones.

In 1998, the program continued with over 400 homes in the program, although there was an   increase in fees

Neighborhood Fire Ant Abatement Program Summary
  1993 1994 1995 1996
Number of blocks 29 49 51 48
Number of Lots 239 539 606 564
Total acres treated 90 201 186 174
Average lot size (sq.ft.) 16,345 16,258 12,977 11,370
Cost per 1,000 sq.ft $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50

Problems and Solutions: Many homeowners are not participating for 2 consecutive years due to the lack of fire ant pressure resulting from the previous year's treatments. We offered a maintenance program in 1998 for those who participated in 1997. The maintenance program  consisted of 3 treatments of 3/4 lb. of a bait formulations per acre, at a reduced cost. Due to last spring rains the first applications were not made until late May, but the final application started in late August. This program would reduce labor by reducing the number of treatment from 6 to 3 per year, it reduce the amount of bait applied per year from 4.1 lbs /A (2 broadcast and 3 mound treatments) to 2.25 lb/A, reduce the cost to homeowners, and encourage continuing participation in the program. Texarkana experienced a large number of mound treatments in 1996 due to the unseasonably large amount of rains during the summer. The rains not only were favorable to ant production, but caused treatments to be late and less effective.

Another potential question that will arise as the area of residential treatment enlarges, is the effect untreated commercial areas will have on adjoining abatement neighborhoods. These areas will be a source of continual reinfestation unless some method of treatment is used. Solutions to this problem have yet to be explored.

A national organization of county agents recently awarded the program top honors at their conference in San Antonio, TX in 1998 -- in the area of reduced pesticide usage.

 

Back to Red Imported Fire Ant Community Abatement


© 2006
University of Arkansas
Division of Agriculture
All rights reserved.
Last Date Modified 02/02/2012
Webmaster

University of Arkansas • Division of Agriculture
Cooperative Extension Service
2301 South University Avenue
Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 • USA
Phone (501) 671-2000 • Fax (501) 671-2209
 

MissionDisclaimerEEO
PrivacyFOI