U of A University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture

Pictures of chickens, flowers, wheat, a boy looking through a magnifying glass, irrigation pipe, soybean pods, and fruits and vegetables.

Cooperative Extension Service

Cooperative Extension Service

Agricultural Experiment Station


Search | Publications | Jobs | Personnel Directory | Links
County Offices | Departments

About Us

Find Us

For the Media

Agriculture

Aquaculture
       & Fisheries

Beef
Beekeeping
Corn
Cotton
Dairy
Forage/Pasture
Forestry
Grain Sorghum
Horses
Horticulture
      Commercial

Poultry
Rice
Soybean
Specialty Agriculture
Swine
Wheat

Links
Newsletters

Business & Communities

Families & Consumers

Health & Nutrition

Home & Garden

Natural Resources

4-H Youth Development

Public Policy Center

For Faculty & Staff

Giving

Dale Bumpers College
of Agricultural, Food &
Life Sciences


Division Home


Agricultural Experiment
      Station Home


Cooperative Extension
      Service Home

Agricultural and Food Policy
DownloadAgri Outlook Radio
Number 90

Policy: Part 3. Rice and Cotton Sector Considerations As the Senate Debates the New Farm Bill (4:43 minutes)

Audio/Video Script:

Dr. Bobby Coats
Extension Economist
University of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture

Part 3, rice and cotton sector considerations as the Senate debates the new farm bill. I’m Bobby Coats Extension Economist University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture.

Understand the following continued:

  • Rice and cotton production costs have risen dramatically since 2002 giving even our best producers cash flow concerns and making them extremely sensitive to policy changes that negatively impact their operations.
     
  • Strong global growth and damaging weather events since 2002 have dramatically increased rice and cotton producer’s cost of production. Couple this with farm policy and trade uncertainty, volatile and uncertain commodity prices and one can begin to understand our producers’ financial and policy sensitivity and concerns about their future.
     
  • Our best producers are uneasy about their future. If our best producers have concern, then the remaining 2/3’s have real adjustments to make. Per unit costs must be managed to remain competitive.

There are numerous ways to access the financial health of our rice and cotton producers. Given today’s farm business setting then I believe that the following indicates the financial challenges these operations face.

I consider the following typical of the top third of Arkansas rice farms. It is my opinion that this operation has the capability to survive the most damaging economic or policy trauma.

  • In 2002 this farm spent $14.71 per acre on fuel expenditures and in 2006 the cost was $59.19 per acre or a 302% increase. The per gallon increase in the cost of fuel amounted to 144%. Even with drought conditions and management practices contributing to increased energy use the energy cost increase due to rising energy prices were and continue to be staggering.
     
  • Total actual costs less debt costs, family living, and taxes were up 43% for rice and up 47% for soybeans from 2002 through 2006.
     
  • A financial analysis of the operation using average farm market prices for marketing periods 2002 through 2006 showed the following:
  • 2006 Cash Surplus of $4.75 per acre
  • 2005 Cash Surplus of $12.34 per acre
  • 2004 Cash Surplus of $0.01 per acre
  • 2003 Cash Deficit of -$15.50 per acre
  • 2002 Cash Deficit of -$17.21 per acre
     
  • A financial analysis of the operation using a strong farm marketing program for marketing periods 2002 through 2006 showed the following:
  • 2006 Cash Surplus of $18.01 per acre
  • 2005 Cash Surplus of $24.77 per acre
  • 2004 Cash Surplus of $4.50 per acre
  • 2003 Cash Surplus of $3.50 per acre
  • 2002 Cash Surplus of $2.29 per acre
  • To conclude this section, the farm business challenges that our rice and cotton producers are now experiencing are the most challenging they’ve experienced. Change and reform are happening; policy that accelerates change will be very disruptive if not destructive to these farm businesses.

    Producers have an array of options when considering their future, some of which are increased productivity; expansion; aggressively expand into grain and confinement operations and/or fruit, nut, and vegetable operations; another occupation; additional off farm income; and retirement.

    This has been Bobby Coats Extension Economist University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture.

    Back to Agricultural and Food Policy Radio


    © 2006
    University of Arkansas
    Division of Agriculture
    All rights reserved.
    Last Date Modified 01/15/2010
    Webmaster

    University of Arkansas • Division of Agriculture
    Cooperative Extension Service
    2301 South University Avenue
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 • USA
    Phone (501) 671-2000 • Fax (501) 671-2209
     

    MissionDisclaimerEEO
    PrivacyFOI