Printer Friendly Version
Eye White Percentage
as a Predictor of Temperament in Beef Cattle
• Effects of Early Gestational
Undernutrition on Fetal Growth, Organ Development and Placentomal
Composition in the Bovine
• An evaluation of bovine
respiratory disease complex in feedlot cattle: Impact on performance
and carcass traits using treatment records and lung lesion scores
• Performance and carcass
traits of finishing heifers fed crude glycerin
• Growth implants reduced
tenderness of steaks from steers and heifers with different genetic
potentials for growth and marbling
• Mother's milk
Eye White Percentage as a Predictor of
Temperament in Beef Cattle
(Core et al., University of Guelph, Guelph)
Accurately evaluating and selecting for calm temperament in beef
cattle is important for economic and animal welfare reasons.
Previous studies have shown that eye white can be a predictor of a
multitude of emotions across different situations, but there is
little research on the relationship between eye white and
temperament. The objective of this experiment was to assess the
accuracy and reliability of using the percentage of exposed eye
white as a predictor of temperament in beef cattle. Forty-eight
heifers, 39 bulls and 60 steers were video-recorded while in a
squeeze chute, and two still digital images from each animal were
selected for eye white determination. Chute temperament scores were
assigned: 1 (calm) to 5 (agitated). Flight speeds were measured
blindly and independently during a subsequent test where the amount
of time it took a solitary animal to pass a handler and travel a
specified distance was recorded. Eye white area was expressed as the
percentage of exposed eye area. Each image was analyzed twice to
determine tracing repeatability.
- The mean percentages of eye white were 30.1%, 31.4% and
28.6% for the heifers, bulls and steers, respectively.
- The correlation coefficients for eye white percentage and
chute temperament scores were 0.67, 0.95 and 0.70 for the
heifers, bulls and steers, respectively.
- The correlations between eye white and flight speeds were
0.42, 0.33 and 0.29 for the heifers, bulls and steers,
respectively.
Results from this study indicate that percent for the heifers,
bulls and steers, respectively, could be used as a quantitative tool
with minimal equipment to assess temperament in beef cattle,
providing an objective method for temperament selection.
Effects of Early Gestational
Undernutrition on Fetal Growth, Organ Development and Placentomal
Composition in the Bovine
(Long et al., University of Wyoming, North Dakota State University
and University of Texas Health Sciences Center)
Fetal intra-uterine growth restriction is known to negatively
impact offspring health postnatally. This study evaluated the
impacts of early gestational undernutrition followed by
realimentation on bovine fetal and placental growth. Thirty
multiparous beef cows bred to a single sire and gestating female
fetuses were fed either to meet NRC recommendations (control) or fed
below NRC recommendations (nutrient restricted) from day 30 to 125
of gestation. On day 125 of gestation, 10 control and 10
nutrient-restricted cows were necropsied. The remaining five
nutrient-restricted cows were realimented to achieve similar body
weight and body condition score with the remaining five control cows
by day 190 of gestation; both groups were necropsied at day 245 of
gestation.
- Fetal weight at day 125 of gestation was 2.1 lb for control
cows; however, fetal weights of nutrient-restricted cows fell
into two distinct groups: nutrient-restricted cows with fetal
weights similar to controls (2.1 lb) and fetal weights of
nutrient-restricted cows that were reduced (1.7 lb).
- Fetal brain weight as a percentage of fetal weight was
increased (~11%) in the nutrient-restricted reduced fetuses
weight group compared to fetuses from control cows and
nutrient-restricted cows with fetal weights similar to controls,
which were similar.
- Fetal heart weight as a percentage of fetal weight also
tended to be increased (~10%) in the nutrient-restricted reduced
fetuses weight group compared to control fetuses.
- The nutrient-restricted reduced fetuses weight group
exhibited reduced cotyledonary weights compared to
nutrient-restricted cows with fetal weights similar to controls
and control cows (0.42 vs. 0.68, and 0.74 lb, respectively).
- On day 245 of gestation, fetal weights and caruncle weight
were similar for nutrient-restricted and control cows;
cotyledonary weights, however, were reduced in
nutrient-restricted vs. control cows (3.2 vs. 4.7 lb).
Decreased fetal growth in nutrient-restricted cows on day 125 of
gestation was associated with decreased cotyledonary weights and
reduced placentomal surface areas. The return of nutrient-restricted
cows to a body weight and body condition scores similar to that of
control cows through realimentation beginning on day 126 resulted in
similar fetal weights of nutrient-restricted and control cows by day
245 of gestation. Thus, a bout of fetal intra-uterine growth
restriction may go undetected if cows undernourished during early
gestation receive feed supplementation in the second half of
gestation to assure normal birth weight.
An Evaluation of Bovine Respiratory
Disease Complex in Feedlot Cattle: Impact on Performance and
CarcassTraits UsingTreatment Records and Lung Lesion Scores
(Schneider et al., Iowa State University)
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of
bovine respiratory disease (BRD) complex on economically important
production traits with the use of health records in combination with
lung lesion scores obtained at harvest. Records from 5,976 animals
were used in this study from cattle that were managed in Midwestern
feedlots. Average daily gain for three different feeding periods
(acclimation, on-test and overall test) along with final body weight
was evaluated as performance measures. Hot carcass weight,
longissimus muscle area, subcutaneous fat cover and marbling score
were collected at harvest. All calves were monitored by experienced
feedlot personnel and treated according to the specific health
protocol of each feedlot.
- Incidence of BRD was observed at a rate of 8.2%, and lung
lesions at harvest were present in 61.9% of cattle from a sub
population (n = 1,665).
- From this group of cattle, the overall incidence of BRD,
defined as incidence of BRD and/or cattle with lung lesions at
the packing plant, was 64.4%.
- Incidence of BRD in the feedlot decreased average daily gain
during both the acclimation period (0.82 lb) and the overall
test period (0.15 lb).
- Incidence of BRD also had significant effects on HCW and
marbling score with reduction of 18 lb and 0.13, respectively,
in treated cattle.
The adverse effects on production traits tended to increase as
the number of treatments increased. Potential decrease in
performance and carcass merit observed in this study were associated
with a decline of $23.23, $30.15 and $54.01 in carcass value when
comparing cattle never treated to cattle treated once, twice or
three or more times, respectively. The presence of lung lesions did
not have a significant effect on any of the traits; however, there
was an association between the presence of active bronchial lymph
nodes and lower productivity of feedlot cattle.
Performance and Carcass Traits of
Finishing Heifers Fed Crude Glycerin
(Parsons et al., Kansas State University)
Crossbred heifers (930 lb) were fed finishing diets containing 0,
2, 4, 8, 12 or 16% crude glycerin (DM basis). Diets consisted of
steam-flaked corn with 6% alfalfa hay and 1.2% urea and provided 300
mg of monensin, 90 mg of tylosin and 0.5 mg of melengestrol acetate
per animal daily. Cattle were transitioned from the control diet to
diets containing increasing proportions of glycerin over a period of
10 days. Cattle had ad libitum access to feed, and diets were
delivered once daily throughout the 85-day trial period.
- As the concentration of glycerin increased, dry matter
intake decreased linearly. Heifers fed 0, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16%
glycerin had average daily gain of 2.62, 2.95, 2.84, 2.76, 2.58
and 2.34 lb, respectively.
- Gain to feed ratio was optimal when glycerin was fed at 2%
of the diet.
- Glycerin increased the final body weight by 28, 18 and 12 lb
when fed at 2, 4 and 8% of the diet, respectively, but reduced
the final body weight by 4 and 32 lb when included at 12 and 16%
of the diet.
- Similarly, hot carcass weight increased by 18, 11 and 7 lb
when glycerin was fed at 2, 4 and 8% of the diet, respectively,
but were 3 and 20 lb less than controls when glycerin was fed at
12 and 16%, respectively.
- Longissimus muscle area decreased linearly as glycerin
concentrations increased and feeding glycerin resulted in linear
decreases in subcutaneous fat over the 12th rib and marbling
scores.
- Glycerin tended to decrease the percentage of cattle grading
USDA Choice and increase the percentage of cattle grading USDA
Select.
Adding glycerin to cattle-finishing diets improved BW gain and
feed efficiency, particularly when added at
concentrations of 8% or less on a DM basis.
Growth Implants Reduced Tenderness of
Steaks From Steers and Heifers With Different Genetic Potentials for
Growth and Marbling1
(Boles et al., Montana State University and Northern
Agricultural Research Center, Fort Circle, Havre, MT)
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of growth
implants on the carcass characteristics and tenderness of steers and
heifers with different genetic potentials for growth, lean meat
yield production and marbling. Two experiments were conducted.
Experiment 1 evaluated Angus steers sired by bulls with high EPD for
retail product yield or marbling. Implant treatment was imposed
randomly within sire groups. Loins were collected from each carcass
and cut into three 2.54-cm steaks aged for 7, 14 and 21 days to
evaluate tenderness. The second experiment evaluated steers and
heifers of British and Continental breed descent. Steers and heifers
were slaughtered after 120 days on feed. Loin sections were
collected, and one 2.54-cm steak aged 7 days was used for tenderness
analysis.
- When implants were used in Angus steers, hot carcass weight
and longissimus muscle area increased, whereas internal fat and
marbling decreased.
- In Angus steers, sire type did not affect shear force values
of steaks; however, implant use significantly increased (less
tender) shear force values.
- Carcasses from cattle of Continental breed descent were
significantly heavier than carcasses of British breed descent
with larger longissimus muscle area, slightly less fat and a
reduced yield grade.
- Also, steer carcasses were heavier than heifer carcasses
with larger longissimus muscle, but no effect of sex on fat
depth, internal fat, yield grade or marbling was observed.
- No significant interactions were seen between growth implant
and breed or between growth implant and sex for shear force
values.
- Shear force values were significantly less (more tender) for
steaks from steers and heifers of British descent compared with
steers and heifers of Continental descent.
- Steaks from implanted steers and heifers had significantly
greater shear force values than steaks from steers and heifers
not implanted.
Use of growth implants in growing cattle resulted in
significantly heavier carcass weights, larger longissimus muscle
area and reduced internal fat. However, implant use also reduced the
amount of marbling along with contributing to reduced tenderness.
Complicating the tenderness issue are the increased shear force
values reported for heifers as well as steers of Continental breed
descent. Use of implants may contribute to tenderness variability
because of different animal responses to implants.
Mother's Milk
(Culinology,December 2008)
In September, acting out of concern for the suffering of dairy
cows, PETA sent Ben & Jerry's cofounders Ben Cohen and Jerry
Greenfield a formal request to replace cow's milk in their ice cream
with human breast milk. The company respectfully declined, saying:
"We applaud PETA's novel approach to bringing attention to an issue,
but we believe a mother's milk is best used for her child."
Tom R. Troxel
Professor and Associate Department Head - Animal Science
The information given herein is for educational purposes only.
Reference to commercial products or trade names is made with the
understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement
by the Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service is implied.
Printed by the University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension
Service Printing Services.
Back to
Beef Cattle Research